South Africa COVID-19 PPE audit: what happened next
- Auditor
- Auditor-General South Africa, with later SIU and Special Tribunal action
- Report date
- 2 September 2020 first special report and 9 December 2020 second special report
- Subject
- Financial management of COVID-19 initiatives, including PPE procurement
- Contractor
- Multiple suppliers across national, provincial and local government
- Status
- partly resolved
- Last checked
- 19 October 2026
What the audit found
AGSA began real-time audits in May 2020 and tabled its first national and provincial special report on 2 September 2020 3. The health-sector review focused on needs analysis, ordering, price compliance, delivery and payment for PPE 1.
The first report listed about R2.13 billion in health-sector PPE spending from voted funds by 31 July 2020, based on unaudited accounting data. Gauteng accounted for about R1.37 billion in that table 1.
Testing identified orders above National Treasury price limits in several provinces. Examples included masks in Gauteng priced 565% above the listed limit and gloves in North West priced 502% above the listed limit. These were audit comparisons of orders, not criminal findings 1.
The auditors tested 116 health-sector contracts worth R2.214 billion and recorded specification gaps, weak goods-receipt controls, items accepted that differed from orders and other supply chain failures 1. The second special report expanded the real-time work and was tabled on 9 December 2020 2,3.
The official response
Accounting officers told AGSA they would add compliance checks before orders and payments, centralise some procurement and strengthen pharmaceutical purchasing controls. The first report recorded separate corrective actions by affected provincial departments 1.
The later AGSA summary said control improvements reduced some payment and grant errors. It recorded supplier contact, corrected under-deliveries and recoveries in some cases where PPE prices exceeded Treasury limits 3.
The official response varied by institution. Parliament recorded that one department, Environment, Forestry and Fisheries, had no finding against its PPE transactions in the first audit work then available 8.
Parliament
The Standing Committee on Public Accounts received an SIU progress briefing on 1 September 2021. The committee recorded that investigations were still under way and that the SIU was working with police, the Hawks and the National Prosecuting Authority 4.
At a later briefing on the SIU's sixth progress report, Parliament recorded 5,054 contracts worth R14.8 billion under investigation across 2,686 service providers. The committee pressed for better use of supplier restrictions and referrals 5.
Finance committees had earlier heard from National Treasury on 5 August 2020 about emergency procurement instructions and monthly disclosure of PPE procurement above R1 million 9.
Follow-up audits and recommendations
AGSA continued the work in its normal 2020 to 2021 audits after the two special reports. It recorded six material irregularities tied to uneconomic COVID-19 procurement, mainly PPE, and estimated financial loss across all unresolved material irregularities at R11.9 billion 10. That R11.9 billion figure covers more than PPE 10.
AGSA said auditees had taken steps to investigate irregularities, recover losses and impose consequences. It cited corrected education-sector deliveries and some recovery where prices exceeded Treasury limits 3.
No single follow-up report closing every PPE recommendation, investigation and recovery across all provinces was found as of 19 October 2026.
Courts, tribunals and investigations
The Special Tribunal froze R38.7 million in August 2020 in litigation concerning a Gauteng Health PPE contract. The order preserved funds during the SIU case and did not by itself decide criminal guilt 7.
The Tribunal later ordered 21 respondents in that matter to forfeit money to the state, according to its official statements page 6. Other judgments reached different results on their own records. In a Free State PPE case, the SIU abandoned part of the relief after not making out a case on the wider procurement 11.
The SIU final report on matters released in February 2021 recorded both adverse and favourable outcomes. For one Free State mask supplier, it found the emergency deviations were motivated and authorised and the applicable Treasury instructions were followed 12.
Where it stands now
The two AGSA special reports are complete 1,2. Later annual audits, SIU investigations and Special Tribunal litigation produced a mix of referrals, recoveries, corrective action and matters with no adverse finding 3,68,12.
The national status remains partly resolved. The source record does not support one total for final PPE recoveries or one final outcome for every supplier and institution as of 19 October 2026.
Timeline
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| May 2020 | AGSA starts real-time audits of COVID-19 initiatives 3 |
| 5 August 2020 | Parliament finance committees receive Treasury briefing 9 |
| 21 August 2020 | Special Tribunal freezes R38.7 million in a Gauteng PPE matter 7 |
| 2 September 2020 | AGSA tables first national and provincial special report 1,3 |
| 9 December 2020 | AGSA tables second national and provincial special report 2,3 |
| 4 February 2021 | Tribunal statement records forfeiture orders in the Ledla matter 6 |
| 1 September 2021 | SCOPA receives SIU progress update 4 |
| 2022 | SCOPA receives sixth SIU progress report on COVID-19 contracts 5 |
Common questions
How much PPE spending did the first report list?
It listed about R2.13 billion in health-sector PPE spending from voted funds by 31 July 2020. The table was marked unaudited 1.
Did every PPE contract have an adverse finding?
No. The record includes adverse findings, corrective actions and matters where official reviews found compliance or no finding 8,12.
Was money recovered?
Yes, official records describe some recoveries and forfeiture orders, but no single final national recovery total was found 3,6.
Did the audit prove crimes?
No. Audit findings are not criminal convictions. SIU referrals, tribunal cases and any criminal process have their own legal tests 1,47.
Audit cases move on. Each page shows the date we last checked it. Spotted an error or a newer official record? Email hello@auditoutcomes.org with the official link.
Sources
- Auditor-General South Africa: first special report on financial management of COVID-19 initiatives (2 September 2020)
- Auditor-General South Africa: second special report on financial management of COVID-19 initiatives (9 December 2020)
- Auditor-General South Africa: closing review of COVID-19 initiatives in the 2020 to 2021 audit cycle (2021)
- Parliament of South Africa: SCOPA receives SIU PPE investigation update (1 September 2021)
- Parliament of South Africa: SCOPA receives sixth SIU COVID-19 contracts progress report (2022)
- Special Tribunal of South Africa: official statements and Ledla forfeiture record (2020 to 2021)
- Special Tribunal of South Africa: first COVID-19 PPE matter and freezing order (21 August 2020)
- Parliament of South Africa: committee records no first-report finding against Environment procurement (6 October 2020)
- Parliament of South Africa: finance committees briefed on COVID-19 PPE procurement (5 August 2020)
- Auditor-General South Africa: material irregularities in 2020 to 2021 national and provincial audits (2021)
- Special Tribunal of South Africa: Free State PPE judgment, case FS 01 2020 (2022)
- Special Investigating Unit: final report on matters completed under Proclamation R23 of 2020 (5 February 2021)
Related
- Auditor-General findings on South Africa's Home Affairs IT and the ABIS contract
AGSA findings on Home Affairs IT and the R409 million ABIS biometric contract, the forensic probe, Parliament's hearings and the 2024/25 audit result.
- Australia Robodebt: audit, Royal Commission and follow-up
The ANAO, Senate, Royal Commission, government response, Federal Court settlement, reforms and the current NACC investigation.
- ArriveCAN audit: findings, responses and where the case stands
The Auditor General audited ArriveCAN in February 2024. What followed: Parliament, the procurement ombud, the RCMP and the GC Strategies ban.
- Special audits explained
What a special audit is, who can request one, how its scope differs from annual audit work and what happens after publication.
- What happens after a government audit: the stages from report to outcome
The stages after a public audit report: management response, public accounts hearings, tracking, follow-up audits, referrals, recovery and courts.